<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PNRC &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pnrc.net/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pnrc.net</link>
	<description>Public Notice Resource Center, Inc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:49:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>New Jersey SB 2072 Removes Public Notices from Newspapers</title>
		<link>http://www.pnrc.net/2010/07/new-jersey-sb-2072-removes-public-notices-from-newspapers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pnrc.net/2010/07/new-jersey-sb-2072-removes-public-notices-from-newspapers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pnrc.net/?p=755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[July 22 – We wanted to bring to your attention to a New Jersey SB 2072. This contentious bill just passed a crucial Senate committee earlier this week.  SB 2072 would remove public notices from newspapers and have them posted online on government websites.
 “Many small newspaper rely on these legal advertisements to keep afloat,” Star-Ledger [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>July 22</strong> </span>– We wanted to bring to your attention to a New Jersey <a href="http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2010/Bills/S2500/2072_I1.PDF" target="_blank">SB 2072</a>. This contentious bill just passed a crucial Senate committee earlier this week.  SB 2072 would remove public notices from newspapers and have them posted online on government websites.</p>
<p> <em>“Many small newspaper rely on these legal advertisements to keep afloat,” Star-Ledger publisher Richard Vezza stated in his testimony at the hearing on Monday.</em></p>
<p><em>“Without them, local newspapers may close, resulting in less scrutiny of local government and a citizen’s right to know.”</em></p>
<p><em>The Jersey City Independent</em> published an article on SB 2072&#8217;s movement.</p>
<p>The article will be included in the July issue of <em>of Record</em>, and will be available on the PNRC website. For your convenience, a link to the full article is below:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jerseycityindependent.com/2010/07/21/trouble-for-new-jerseys-newspapers-bill-moving-public-notices-to-web-clears-senate-panel/" target="_self">Trouble for New Jersey&#8217;s Newspapers? Bill Moving Public Notices to Web Clears Senate Panel</a>, (7.21.2010)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pnrc.net/2010/07/new-jersey-sb-2072-removes-public-notices-from-newspapers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Massachusetts HB 4800 includes legal newspaper in new definition</title>
		<link>http://www.pnrc.net/2010/07/ma-hb-4800/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pnrc.net/2010/07/ma-hb-4800/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 16:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pnrc.net/?p=733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Case You Missed It…
Pending legislation in Massachusetts would redefine newspaper publication of public notices to expressly include legal newspapers.
The bill states:
SECTION 98. Chapter 211B of the General Laws, is hereby amended by adding the following section:
Section 21. Whenever a department established under this chapter is required to publish a notice in a newspaper by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Case You Missed It…</p>
<p>Pending legislation in Massachusetts would redefine newspaper publication of public notices to expressly include legal newspapers.</p>
<p>The bill states:</p>
<p><em>SECTION 98. Chapter 211B of the General Laws, is hereby amended by adding the following section:</p>
<p>Section 21. Whenever a department established under this chapter is required to publish a notice in a newspaper by any general or special law, order, rule or judgment of any court, that department shall be deemed as having met all notice requirements by publishing in a newspaper which by its title page purports to be printed or published in such town, city or county, or having a circulation therein. For purposes of this section, the definition of newspaper shall include legal newspapers.</em></p>
<p>A link to the full text of the legislation can be found at:  <a href="http://www.mass.gov/legis/bills/house/186/ht04pdf/ht04800.pdf">H.B. 4800</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pnrc.net/2010/07/ma-hb-4800/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Save the Date</title>
		<link>http://www.pnrc.net/2010/06/save-the-date/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pnrc.net/2010/06/save-the-date/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 17:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pnrc.net/?p=708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ACCN/PNRC 2010 Conference in Portland, Oregon

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3 style="text-align: left;"><a class="alignleft" title="2010 ACCN/PNRC Conference" href="http://accnnotices.wordpress.com/2010-conference-in-portland/" target="_blank"><strong>ACCN/PNRC 2010 Conference in Portland, Oregon</strong></a></h3>
<p style="text-align: left;">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pnrc.net/2010/06/save-the-date/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPad Hacked and User Data Compromised</title>
		<link>http://www.pnrc.net/2010/06/ipad-hacked-and-user-data-compromised/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pnrc.net/2010/06/ipad-hacked-and-user-data-compromised/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 20:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pnrc.net/?p=697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AT&#38;T announced on June 9th that hackers found a security hole in the iPad that allowed hackers to obtain thousands of customer&#8217;s email addresses, including White House staff, the mayor of New York, the chief executive at the New York Times, and military personnel.  The latest breach provides startling evidence of corporations&#8217; inability to guarantee [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AT&amp;T announced on June 9th that hackers found a security hole in the iPad that allowed hackers to obtain thousands of customer&#8217;s email addresses, including White House staff, the mayor of New York, the chief executive at the New York Times, and military personnel.  The latest breach provides startling evidence of corporations&#8217; inability to guarantee protection of sensitive customer information.  This incident highlights the fragility of the Internet and the malleability of notices posted on a website.  With hackers compromising websites, due process is not being served if the information cannot be authenticated or provided permanence on the Internet.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704575304575297210807737710.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_MIDDLETopStories">AT&amp;T Discloses Breach of iPad Owner Data</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pnrc.net/2010/06/ipad-hacked-and-user-data-compromised/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Americans distrust their government, study finds</title>
		<link>http://www.pnrc.net/2010/04/americans-distrust-their-government-study-finds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pnrc.net/2010/04/americans-distrust-their-government-study-finds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 17:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pnrc.net/?p=663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pew finds that Americans want government reform and government power curtailed.  In a time of fiscal uncertainty, more Americans are not as trusting of their government. 
&#8220;Just 22% say they can trust the government in Washington almost always or most of the time, among the lowest measures in half a century.&#8221;
With such malcontent for government, it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pew finds that Americans want government reform and government power curtailed.  In a time of fiscal uncertainty, more Americans are not as trusting of their government. </p>
<p>&#8220;<em>Just 22% say they can trust the government in Washington almost always or most of the time, among the lowest measures in half a century</em>.&#8221;</p>
<p>With such malcontent for government, it is unlikely that the first place citizens will turn to for information will be a government website.</p>
<p><a href="http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1569/trust-in-government-distrust-discontent-anger-partisan-rancor">Distrust, Discontent, Anger and Partisan Rancor</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pnrc.net/2010/04/americans-distrust-their-government-study-finds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government Websites Prove Vulnerable to Hackers</title>
		<link>http://www.pnrc.net/2010/01/congressional-websites-hacked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pnrc.net/2010/01/congressional-websites-hacked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pnrc.net/?p=583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hours after President Obama&#8217;s State of the Union address on Wednesday night, 49 Members&#8217; of the House of Representatives found their Congressional websites defamed by hackers.  According to a joint letter by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH), &#8220;this is the second time in a year websites hosted and supported by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hours after President Obama&#8217;s State of the Union address on Wednesday night, 49 Members&#8217; of the House of Representatives found their Congressional websites defamed by hackers.  According to a joint letter by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH), &#8220;this is the second time in a year websites hosted and supported by this vendor have been compromised.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/house/78629-bachus-asks-if-house-hacking-related-to-august-cyber-attack">Pelosi, Boehner Demand Additional Web Safeguards After Thursday&#8217;s Cyber-Attack</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pnrc.net/2010/01/congressional-websites-hacked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iowa Legislature Sees Value of Public Notice</title>
		<link>http://www.pnrc.net/2010/01/iowa-legislature-sees-value-o-public-notice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pnrc.net/2010/01/iowa-legislature-sees-value-o-public-notice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pnrc.net/?p=575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IOWA &#8211; A threat to shift government legal notices from newspapers to  websites appears to have been stalled at the legislative level.  Today, state Senator Staci Appel, responsible for managing a state government reorganization and efficiency bill declared &#8220;the publication (provision) is out.&#8221;
Public Notice Shift Hits Legislative Snag
The bill passed out of subcommittee on Wednesday [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IOWA &#8211; A threat to shift government legal notices from newspapers to  websites appears to have been stalled at the legislative level.  Today, state Senator Staci Appel, responsible for managing a state government reorganization and efficiency bill declared &#8220;the publication (provision) is out.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.globegazette.com/articles/2010/01/20/news/latest/doc4b5765587b085441787262.txt#vmix_media_id=9522946">Public Notice Shift Hits Legislative Snag</a></p>
<p>The bill passed out of subcommittee on Wednesday and subsequently several editorials were published highlighting the value of public notice in newspapers including:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/news/opinion/columnists/article_7cef18ab-41e5-5f22-8cbc-dda1052396c8.html">Public Notices Are Vital To Healthy Democracy</a>, 1/16/2010</p>
<p><a href="http://www.southwestiowanews.com/articles/2010/01/17/council_bluffs/opinion/doc4b52737ecf3fc242884135.txt">Accountability For Tax Dollars</a>, 1/17/2010</p>
<p><a href="http://westlibertyindex.com/article.php?viewID=3052">Public Notices Belong In Newspapers, Not Online</a>, 1/20/2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pnrc.net/2010/01/iowa-legislature-sees-value-o-public-notice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State Website Fails to Make Contracts Accessible on Website</title>
		<link>http://www.pnrc.net/2009/12/state-website-fails-to-make-contracts-accessible-on-website/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pnrc.net/2009/12/state-website-fails-to-make-contracts-accessible-on-website/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pnrc.net/?p=539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PENNSYLVANIA &#8211; Under the open records law, taxpayer-funded contracts are supposed to be accessible on the state Treasury website within a matter of days.  However, the electronic posting of information has seen lengthy delays.
Web site runs into problems
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PENNSYLVANIA &#8211; Under the open records law, taxpayer-funded contracts are supposed to be accessible on the state Treasury website within a matter of days.  However, the electronic posting of information has seen lengthy delays.</p>
<p><a href="http://thedailyreview.com/opinion/capitol-matters-web-site-runs-into-problems-1.481937">Web site runs into problems</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pnrc.net/2009/12/state-website-fails-to-make-contracts-accessible-on-website/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Legislator Using Public Notice Legislation To Avenge Newspapers Unfavorable Coverage?</title>
		<link>http://www.pnrc.net/2009/12/florida/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pnrc.net/2009/12/florida/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 20:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pnrc.net/?p=537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FLORIDA &#8211; Threats to permit governments to post legal notices online have been renewed for the 2010 legislative session. And it appears the bill&#8217;s sponsor, Sen. Dean is more than happy to attack newspapers in the process:
&#8220;But he conceded the legislation could hurt Florida newspapers, including his hometown Chronicle.
&#8216;If it does, it is what it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FLORIDA &#8211; Threats to permit governments to post legal notices online have been renewed for the 2010 legislative session. And it appears the bill&#8217;s sponsor, Sen. Dean is more than happy to attack newspapers in the process:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;But he conceded the legislation could hurt Florida newspapers, including his hometown Chronicle.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8216;If it does, it is what it is,&#8217; Dean said. &#8216;The motivation for this is to save money. But if it trims their feathers a bit, fine.&#8217;&#8221;</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.jaxobserver.com/2009/12/12/does-dean-public-notice-bill-stem-from-papers-coverage/">Does Public Notice Bill Stem From Paper’s Coverage?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pnrc.net/2009/12/florida/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Report Is Pretty Old, But Who Knew?</title>
		<link>http://www.pnrc.net/2009/12/new-report-is-pretty-old-but-who-knew/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pnrc.net/2009/12/new-report-is-pretty-old-but-who-knew/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 21:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pnrc.net/?p=544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When it’s on the Internet, it is invisible.
This breaking news from Huffington Post in response to the White House’s breaking news on the “new” Treasury Department report that turns out to have been available since 1995 is a perfect testament to the obscurity of the Internet.
Treasury Touts Long-Available Derivatives Report As A Part Of Its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it’s on the Internet, it is invisible.</p>
<p>This breaking news from Huffington Post in response to the White House’s breaking news on the “new” Treasury Department report that turns out to have been available since 1995 is a perfect testament to the obscurity of the Internet.</p>
<p><a id="title_permalink" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/09/treasury-touts-long-avail_n_385838.html">Treasury Touts Long-Available Derivatives Report As A Part Of Its &#8216;New&#8217; Open Government Plan</a></p>
<p>So the report has been there all along. Who knew? Obviously the White House was counting on the strong likelihood that few Americans had been to <a href="http://www.occ.treas.gov/deriv/deriv.htm">http://www.occ.treas.gov/deriv/deriv.htm</a> to read this report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pnrc.net/2009/12/new-report-is-pretty-old-but-who-knew/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
